So Which System Should I Build?
As of right now, the Intel roadmap going forward is a little muddled. Let’s try to make some sense of it:
- Socket 1156 will get 32nm, dual core, four-threaded Clarkdale CPUs in late 2009, early 2010.
- Socket 1366 will get 32nm, six core Gulftown some time in 2010 – probably early in the year.
- There is no quad-core update to Lynnfield on Intel’s current roadmap. There may be bumps in clock frequencies, but Intel’s roadmap lacks a four core, 32-nm CPU.
Bottom line: if you go with socket 1156 and Lynnfield, expect to remain there for some time. You may see bumps in clock frequencies, but not a 32nm quad core CPU. Clarkdale looks pretty cool, but dual core + two logical threads doesn’t equal four cores plus four logical threads.
If you go with socket 1366, you have this growth path to the six core, twelve threaded monster Intel is currently calling Gulftown. If, more specifically, you’re building a Core i7 920 system, it’s likely that the 950 and 960 may come down in price a bit. But it’s equally likely that Intel’s goal is to keep the current 900 series priced higher (and clocked higher) than the socket 1156 CPUs.
In the end, if you need to understand what your goals are. Given the existing Lynnfield roadmap, the Core i7 860 is looking like a better long term deal than the Core i5 750. If you plan on building a system that will be running for several years, and don’t have a need or interest in future upgrades, P55 / Lynnfield is more cost effective.
If you plan on moving up the CPU performance chain as prices come down, LGA 1366, with its eventual path to the six core Gulftown, is a better bet. As always, take a look at your current and likely future applications mix, and base you decision on what you want to do with the system – not some mythical desire to impress your geek buddies.
Loading tweets...
20 comments
1 ping
Derek Rost
September 30, 2009 at 10:11 am (UTC -7)
Based on the last paragraph it sounds like the 1156 socket will not get a quad-core. Is that correct, or will it just not get a 32nm quad but still have 45nm quads?
Loyd Case
September 30, 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC -7)
Currently, no official Intel roadmap shows a socket 1156 quad core. However, if you go beyond the Nehalem generation, to Intel’s Sandy Bridge new architecture, the picture gets a little murky. Sandy Bridge will likely offer socket 1156 variants, and reports suggest that Sandy Bridge will offer “… four to eight cores.” So that could be the real successor to quad core Lynnfield.
But Intel isn’t releasing specific product details regarding Sandy Bridge.
What is likely is that we will see 45nm Lynnfield speed bumps, particularly after Gulftown ships. But that’s just crystal ball gazing on my part.
Paul Fabrie
September 30, 2009 at 12:28 pm (UTC -7)
I think that based on my needs and what I am going to be doing on it, i am going to go with the 1156 socket. I am going to start playing Aion: Tower of Eternity but mainly I am a heavy multitasker. I am going to edit video and encode videos to my Creative Zen. And I will be dabbling in several Linux distros through Virtual Box.
Tony
September 30, 2009 at 1:03 pm (UTC -7)
I’m curious what you think about the upcoming Lucid HYDRA chip? Engadget says they’re going to be adding it to some upper end boards for the end of the year. I’m extremely skeptical of the claims, but am still waiting out to see if they deliver.
Eric
September 30, 2009 at 6:05 pm (UTC -7)
After making the same considerations discussed here, I just went the Lynnfield route with an i860 CPU. No regrets; haven’t made an in-place CPU upgrade in a long time.
Loyd Case
September 30, 2009 at 8:47 pm (UTC -7)
MSI is supposed to ship a motherboard with a Lucid chip before the end of the year. I remain unconvinced, not because I think there’s anything wrong with the tech (it looks pretty good), but because it will be a support nightmare. Also: I’m simply not a fan of multi-GPU solutions for desktop PCs.
Paul Fabrie
October 1, 2009 at 8:00 am (UTC -7)
It is supposed to be called the MSI Big Bang. Should be interesting.
YS
October 1, 2009 at 11:45 pm (UTC -7)
Holy cow i7 is midrange?!
I can’t imagine what you’d label those gaming on CPUs like AMD X3 720s or AMD 7750s…
David
October 12, 2009 at 8:35 am (UTC -7)
I wanted was looking to build a new system, and was going to follow your last $800 killer gaming rig( From May of this year), I noticed you used the same Graphics card there and in this build. I want to know if you could compare the two on which would be better to build now. I am upgrading to improve the framerate in WOW, and my old Nvidia GeforceFX 5700 ultra, fan has died. I do not do any video editing, just everyday web email photos, photoshop (occasionally), and the one game mentioned above.
Thanks for any advice you can gives
David
Loyd Case
October 12, 2009 at 1:40 pm (UTC -7)
It really depends on your budget. The Radeon HD 4890 is faster, but costs more. If you can swing yet another $40 more (around the $260), the Radeon HD 5850 is the fastest thing out there today, except for its big brother, the HD 5870.
David
October 13, 2009 at 6:47 am (UTC -7)
Thanks for the quick reply! Also for chipset and motherboard recommendation, which one of the two build here would be better, for gaming, VS 800 killer gaming rig’s Core 2 Quad Q8400.
David
October 13, 2009 at 7:00 am (UTC -7)
I think was sort of confusing was, that I now know the i7 860 is newer/ Also any reason you chose to use 4GB of ram fro the 860 VS the i7 920? Could this ram http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145222 The cost for the 6GB is $110 after a 20 dollar rebate, (the reason I ask is I ahve a hard time purchasing the right ram for a motherboard in the past) work in the i7 860 ?
Thanks again
Loyd Case
October 13, 2009 at 7:20 am (UTC -7)
The 920 is a triple channel CPU, so you install three memory modules at a time. Typically, that means 3 or 6GB (with three slots filled) or 6 or 12 GB on a board with six memory sockets.
Core i7 860 is dual channel, so you install two modules at a time, which leads to configurations with 2, 4 or 8GB.
David
October 13, 2009 at 8:05 am (UTC -7)
For my question in post 11, the Asus 97P55 w/ Core i& 860, should be great that the chip motherboard combo, in the $800 dollar kilelr gaming rig?
Thanks again!! Hopefully I will order the part later today when I find a case for to fit the mother board
Loyd Case
October 13, 2009 at 8:28 am (UTC -7)
That will definitely be better than the CPU and motherboard in the last $800 gaming rig.
David
October 13, 2009 at 1:31 pm (UTC -7)
I have the core components, for $10 more the ram was just touch more from Newegg, http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzhzb43 I was looking to get the Cool Master case, you had here, but as it did not come with a power supply, are there any minimums for power I will need for the to run the motherboard chipset combination and probably going to go with Radeon HD 5850 [ my first non Nvidia card,
]
Daniel
October 15, 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC -7)
I was wondering, what kind of CPU cooler do you recommend. I’m using socket 1156. Thanks!
Jorel S.
October 24, 2009 at 1:38 am (UTC -7)
Hey Loyd, I’m Currently on a Phenom II x2 @ 3.6ghz + 5850 + 740g chipset motherboard, would I see noticeable improvement in FPS gain if I moved over to either of these platforms your suggesting here?
Fyi, My monitor is a 52″ lcd so my fps/refresh rate is capped at 60.
Even with a 5850 I get some “microstutter” and “hitchy” framerates in certain games where fps dips below 60. I. E. Batman:AA
Loyd Case
October 24, 2009 at 10:14 am (UTC -7)
Are you running at full 1080p on your HDTV when gaming?
In most games, you’ll see a definite frame rate increase. In some, not so much. The slight stuttering you see may just be driver issues in some games, though — 5800 drivers aren’t completely mature yet.
Jorel S.
October 25, 2009 at 6:09 am (UTC -7)
yes that’s correct, Ideal settings for most games would be 4x AA 8x AF @ 1080p. I guess the “stutter” seems to be game-to-game cause its non-existent in games like Dead Space, Half-life 2, Cod4….I find the stutter issue more persistent in Nvidia “meant to be played” games, i.e. batman:AA, bioshock…
Build an Atom-based Nettop PC « All Topics « Improbable Insights
October 14, 2009 at 3:37 pm (UTC -7)
[...] A Pair of Midrange Systems [...]