Comments on: Five Terrible Reasons for Buying a Digital SLR

By: Mark Ditter

Mark Ditter — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:54:57 +0000

Excellent article, Loyd. Whenever I’m in a camera store and see someone looking at dslr’s who probably should not be buying one, I cringe. It’s all I can do to stop myself from interrupting the salesperson to try to tell the customer to buy something else.

I bought my first film slr camera almost 30 years ago, and now own two dslr’s. There are times when a point and shoot camera simply cannot do what I need it to do and the only thing that can get me the pictures I want is a dslr. Still, you know what the funny thing is? I think I get more “keepers” when I am using a P & S camera. It’s much harder to screw something up or set something wrong on a camera that hardly has any settings to adjust.

By: YS

YS — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:27:26 +0000

Loyd, the thing is, they’ll automagically take better pictures. Sure the photos they take may still be bad photos, but they’d be less bad than on a compact P&S. Better tonality, dynamic range, and lower noise. I’ve had some friends who’re definitely not photography hobbyists buy the smaller entry level DSLRs and are amazed at how much better their photos are now. This is on JPG photos without any post-processing!

By: Ivan Miklos

Ivan Miklos — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:30:30 +0000

Yeah, i have to agree with almost all the sentences. However customers are buying a DSLR instead of the simple and easy of use compact, subcompact cameras because they realized that the DSLR cameras have better picture quality. And this is not coming from the talent of the photographer, but the quality of the camera.
They have no idea what the heck is the depth of field. They’re just seeing that the pictures is simply better.
They never realized the colorspace and white balance settings, just seeing that those pictures are well balanced and colors are deeper.
The opportunity to shot a series of pictures can be a very strong stimulus as well.
In sum, a DSLR is simply better than a point-and-shot camera. Even sometimes they have equal number of megapixels, the sensor quality and the optics is far better. And -horrible dictu- some of us aren’t using them better than the compact, we will shot better pictures.

…and of course, i will use my Nikon still to shot a good set of DIA slides. Just compare

By: Dawson Witter

Dawson Witter — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:49:50 +0000

I really see this whole article as a waste of time, sorry to say. I have been a photographer for over 30 years. I currently use two DSLR’s, Nikon and a Canon. I use three film cameras a Nikon F55 and a Nikon F801 along with an F70/N70. I must say that every now and again I am taken by the romance that is film. For what I call real working photography DIGITAL is the only way to fly as long as you know the camera off of the usual AUTO settings and you shoot in RAW only. I need to see what I am capturing right away, and then I need the flexibility of editing in the studio. Film does not afford anywhere near the level of control that Digital does, and so people make sure that you are fully educated in digital and do yourself a huge favor, read your user’s manual as it will allow you to go beyond that AUTO setting. Film is for private work that we might do as photographers, experimenting in weird lighting, or my personal fav – nightime photography, where you control everything just by leaving the camera on the “BULB” setting. Some of my results would blow your mind. Lately though I have even brought digital into this setting and I must say it is really invigerating to see “INSTANT” results. Digital is only going to get stronger and stronger. It is imperative that consumers find out a little before heading into the local store. I find most don’t even know some of the most simple basic points. So people do some WORK and find out what you WANT, and NEED!!!

By: Robert Jensen

Robert Jensen — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:27:13 +0000

When I sold cameras I’d always ask first what they wanted to do with the camera, then I’d ask if they thought they’d get more use out of the smallest pocketable camera or something more jacket pocket sized that had a zoom that would bring the subject closer.

Many times I had a customer come into the store with a list of recommended gear to buy given to them by a friend who was a professional photographer. Seldom was it what they actually needed.

I always felt it was a salesman’s job to educate the customer enough so that they could make an informed decision of what to purchase. (Not unlike the job you and I do with our writings) Not only did I have a customer who was happier with their purchase, but one who’d come back to see me again and again. I had customers who needed their hand held until they got through the learning curve, which I didn’t mind doing as long as the store wasn’t busy. I tried to emulate the best sales people I’d had experience with, the ones who were knowledgeable, enthusiastic – and patient.

By: Loyd Case

Loyd Case — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:22:53 +0000

All good points. My purpose here was to debunk some of the misguided reasons people give for buying a digital SLR. Image quality is one, because people who want to buy a DSLR seem to think they’ll automagically take better pictures. They don’t realize that they often end up using it more as a point-and-shoot, rather than taking advantae of the qualities that come with an SLR, not to mention the learning curve.

The larger sensor size is definitely a factor, but you do have to understand how to exploit it.

By: Robert Jensen

Robert Jensen — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:57:55 +0000

Lloyd,

I’ve enjoyed your work for a long time.

I’ve spent almost 30 years in the photo retail business, 10 years as a working photographer, and the past 2 years with a job similar to your’s.

One thing I’d add to the plus column of DSLR’s is overall image quality, mostly from having a larger sensor and being able to shoot in RAW format. (Camera’s like the Canon G10/G11 are the exception to the rule) Most of the point and shoot cameras people buy are lacking in wide angle, packing something close to an equivalent of 35mm. (Which always surprises me considering that such a focal length makes it almost impossible to shoot the obligatory family around the dining table at Thanksgiving/Christmas/birthday photo).

The strong point to P&S camera’s isn’t so much their ease of use (now there’s an oxymoron for you) but their compact, easy to always carry with you size. I think that for that same reason there’s been such a raise in the popularity of shooting family photos using cell phone cameras. The newest Apple 3GS has a 3 megapixel camera, more than capable of producing a decent 4×6 print or uploading to an online photo album. I think the day is coming (soon) where people aren’t going to bother lugging around even a small P&S camera when they already have something ‘good enough’ built into their cell phones. Then we’ll see the market will shrink to those mega-zoom cameras, traditional DSLR’s, medium format digital cameras or other specialty cameras (i.e. underwater, b&w).

By: Loyd Case

Loyd Case — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:55:28 +0000

“point and shoot SLR” was a typo. I’ve fixed it, thanks.

As long as you thing through why you’d want a DSLR, then by all means, get one. I’ve certainly gotten a lot of use out of mine. Have fun with it!

By: Five Terrible Reasons to Buy a Digital SLR -Improbable Insights

Five Terrible Reasons to Buy a Digital SLR -Improbable Insights — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:38:25 +0000

[...] Case 2009-08-21 18:13:13 See the rest here: Five Terrible Reasons to Buy a Digital SLR -Improbable Insights var addthis_pub = ''; var addthis_language = 'en';var addthis_options = 'email, favorites, digg, [...]

By: Tomas

Tomas — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:27:37 +0000

Hi, sorry to bother Loyd, but what do you mean with “share of point-and-shoot SLRs”? Super-zooms PSs?
And great article! I`m planning on buying one, and the article helped, altought I still plan to buy one.
Thx